Northeast Hearth, Patio and Barbecue Association Blog

NEHPBA Testimony on ME LD 556 - An Act to Preserve Heating and Energy Choice

24 March 2025

March 20, 2025

RE: LD 556 - An Act to Preserve Heating and Energy Choice by Prohibiting a Municipality from Prohibiting a Particular Energy System or Energy Distributor

Dear Members of the State and Local Government Committee,

My name is Karen Arpino, and I am the Executive Director of the Northeast Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association (NEHPBA). I am writing to express strong support for LD 556 (or SP 218), "An Act to Preserve Heating and Energy Choice by Prohibiting a Municipality from Prohibiting a Particular Energy System or Energy Distributor."

NEHPBA is a trade association representing more than 250 individual member hearth and fireplace retail and related companies throughout the Northeast. The vast majority of our members are independent “mom and pop” small businesses that play a significant role in the communities and markets they serve across the state of Maine.

Gas appliances, particularly fireplaces and stoves, serve as a crucial secondary heat source, especially in a cold state like Maine where winter storms can, and have, caused power outages. Without access to these options, families could be left without a dependable way to heat their homes during extreme weather events.

NEHPBA strongly urges the committee to vote unanimously Ought to Pass on this bill. We all want a cleaner environment, and consumers also want the right to choose what energy source works best for their homes and businesses. In Maine, more than 52% of homes and businesses use heating oil, almost 14% use clean propane, more than 8% use natural gas, almost 13% use electricity, and nearly 9% use another fuel source including primarily wood for heating. This bill protects the right of our citizens to decide which energy is right for them.

Across the country, municipalities are adopting policies that ban gas hookups in new construction, eliminating consumer choice and raising energy costs for homeowners. LD 556 would prevent such restrictive mandates in Maine, protecting both consumers and small businesses from unnecessary burdens while ensuring that affordable and reliable heating options remain available.

Heat pumps need the most energy from the grid during the times when the grid is most stressed. When the grid is stressed, the electricity plants switch from using natural gas to diesel or heating oil to generate electricity. For example, January 19, 2025, recorded a peak hourly demand of 19,600 megawatts (MW). The grid required running older thermal generating plants that burn oil and coal. In fact, from January 20 to January 21, 2025 thermal plants that burn oil provided more electricity to the ISO-NE electricity grid than plants that burn natural gas, which is relatively uncommon. At the same time, a coal-fired plant that burns coal in the region supplied close to 300 MW to the grid from January 19 to January 25, 2025. Two other major sources of electricity in New England were steady suppliers during the cold snap. The region’s three nuclear reactors steadily provided 3,350 MW of power throughout the period.  This is why we need alternative energy sources to heat our homes during extreme, harsh winter weeks, especially when these alternative energy sources do not put stress on our fragile electric grid.

LD 556 preserves local control over safety and health. 

• By law, local building codes must follow the Maine Uniform Building and Energy Code, which permits regulation of heating and energy installations based on safety. LD 556 does not remove this authority.
• By law, municipalities may regulate the placement of utility pipes or wires in the public right of way based on the safety of the traveling public. LD 556 does not remove this authority.
• LD 556 does not restrict local authority over the siting of commercial energy generating facilities.

In fact, 88% of Maine voters surveyed believe Mainers should have the right to choose how they heat their homes and businesses. 

Maine consumers need an “all of the above” approach to heating. What may look like the best, least expensive, or most versatile energy option today may not be the best solution tomorrow. Diversification of resources is critical to addressing the long-term needs of Maine residents, businesses, and government.

For these reasons, I respectfully urge the State and Local Government Committee to advance this bill and keep Maine’s residents warm and small businesses protected.

Thank you for your time and consideration,

Karen Arpino

Executive Director

Northeast Hearth, and Patio Association

NEHPBA Testimony in Opposition to Rhode Island All Electric Building Codes Act

20 March 2025

Today NEHPBA submitted this testimony in opposition to the  Rhode Island H5450 RELATING TO PUBLIC PROPERTY AND WORKS -- ALL-ELECTRIC BUILDING ACT. Tonight, Sean Rosser (Hearthside Fireplace & Patio) and I will be testifying in-person at the Rhode Island State House.

To Whom it May Concern,

My name is Karen Arpino, and I am writing on behalf of The Northeast Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association. The Northeast Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association (NEHPBA) is a trade association representing more than 300 individual member hearth and fireplace retail and related companies throughout the Northeast. The vast majority of our members are independent “mom and pop” small businesses that play a large role in the communities and markets they serve across Rhode Island.

The Northeast Hearth, Patio and Barbecue Association (NEHPBA) opposes, as written, H5450 and encourages the legislature to preserve consumer choice with respect to heating and cooking options for Rhode Islanders. 

NEHPBA recognizes the changing landscape of the energy and fossil fuel industry. We are committed to working with government officials and regulators at all levels to increase access to more sustainable and climate-centric fuel sources throughout our homes and businesses to bridge the gap as new fuel technology develops. We are committed to addressing the climate crisis and aspire to be a valuable and reasonable partner in this important conversation in the months and years ahead.

This bill, as it is currently written, would negatively impact our Rhode Island members and their customers by increasing the cost of electricity and limiting the availability of the fuel that our products use. Consumers deserve a choice when deciding what fuel source is used to heat their homes. We encourage Rhode Island legislators to preserve consumer options with respect to heating. 

Rhode Island’s electricity rate is already the 6th highest in the county at 25.31 cents per kilowatt hour while the national average is 12.89 cents per kilowatt hour Source. Electrification will put more pressure on the grid, bringing up the cost even more. Last month, the demand on New England’s grid outpaced supply, leading dramatically to this increase in the cost of utilities. 

Presently, natural gas heats more than half of Rhode Island’s homes. With this in mind, we urge this Committee to carefully consider the negative impact House Bill 5450 would have on families – particularly those living below the poverty line and seniors on fixed incomes – as well as small businesses in Rhode Island.

Consumers Should Have the Right To Choose:

Policymakers should strive to give consumers options. Competition is imperative to protect consumers while driving innovation, ingenuity, and progress. Policymakers should not pick winners and losers but should allow resources and technologies to compete. Free market policies provide the consumer with options to select what best fits their unique set of needs. An all-electrification requirement would remove natural gas from the heating and cooking markets, stripping the consumer of the right to select the heating fuel that best suits their needs. A ban on heating fuels represents the worst type of ban because it effectively affords consumers only one option – electricity – with respect to heating and cooking.

Reliability: The Role of Natural Gas in Reducing Emissions and Balancing the Power System: 

An all-electric heat requirement is doubly bad public policy, which could fail to meet its intended goals. These policies increase the demand for electricity significantly without provisions that ensure that resources are in place to meet this incremental demand. This means that the state will likely have to rely on the use of older and less efficient power plants, burning coal and oil, and importing electricity from states that are not as thoughtful about how it is generated. Moving to all-electric heating with the existing infrastructure will result in more emissions rather than less. The state should not pass any bill that stigmatizes or bans the use of natural gas.

When Electricity Goes Out, Heat Goes Off and People are Left in the Cold: 

A move to all-electric heating and cooking will also leave Rhode Islanders at the mercy of a power grid that is increasingly reliant on intermittent renewables. We have seen the potential consequences of this in Texas and California – both of which rely heavily on wind and solar. When these resources underperform due to the wind not blowing and the sun not shining, grid stability and reliability are compromised, and it can leave residents in the dark and cold. A study from GTI Energy found that power system outages are more than 100 times more frequent than gas system outages. 

Cost:

Good public policy considers cost impacts on consumers, especially those in overburdened communities. All-electric legislation will likely increase costs. According to research conducted by the National Association of Home Builders, all electric homes cost more upfront as compared to gas homes.  State policymakers should also consider that increased electricity use will also impact the need for additional electric bill assistance. Gas fireplaces and gas fireplace inserts can be used as a space heater during the shoulder months. Rather than turning on the entire home heating system in March and October, homeowners can instead use their gas fueled fireplaces and inserts to heat commonly used spaces. 

For all of the reasons outlined above, NEHPBA respectfully opposes legislative and regulatory efforts that remove consumer choice and ban the use of natural gas in new building construction. 

Sincerely, 

Karen Arpino 

Executive Director

Northeast HPBA